Clinical Benchmarks

How AI models score on clinical work

Published results from clinical benchmarks, each linked to the document and page it came from.

Clinical Benchmarks Index

This site’s own calculation from 10 boards, each read on its own 0 to 100 scale. Method of 6 Oct 2026. How it is computed About Report an error

Claude Opus 5 is first at 63.2, from 6 of 10 boards. Three of the next nine have a higher average but rest on fewer boards.

  1. 1Claude Opus 5Anthropic · 6 of 10 boards63.263.2 × 1
    • HealthBench Professional0.59859.8×0.743length-adjusted, Anthropic protocol: adaptive thinking at max effort, Claude Opus 4.8 grader, averaged over 5 trials, no tools or custom system prompt (raw 73.4%).
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)90.9891.0×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)63.5763.6×0.911
    • MAST (Medical AI Superintelligence Test)57.157.1×0.995
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)74.674.6×0.507v2 run on ARISE; 19 models on the board
    • PhysicianBench57.657.6×0.79Anthropic harness; 100 tasks; pass@1; max effort; Opus 5 rubric grader; safety classifiers enabled
    Weighted average of 6 boards
    63.2
    Multiplier for 6 of 10 boards
    × 1
    Index
    63.2 × 1 = 63.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Opus 5

  2. 2GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · 6 of 10 boards61.961.9 × 1
    • HealthBench Professional0.60560.5×0.743length-adjusted, max reasoning effort (64.1 unadjusted, 3,228 mean response chars); GPT-5.6 system card Table 6, column GPT-5.6-SOL. API max-effort setting, not the August ChatGPT production setting measured in row 492.
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2385.2×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-5.6-sol; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)43.9744.0×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5.6-sol; reasoning_effort=max; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedXpertQA (MM)81.581.5×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Qwen-run comparison in the Qwen3.8-Max launch post
    • MAST (Medical AI Superintelligence Test)60.260.2×0.995MAST in preview; 'exact scores may change'
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)70.170.1×0.507
    Weighted average of 6 boards
    61.9
    Multiplier for 6 of 10 boards
    × 1
    Index
    61.9 × 1 = 61.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.6 Sol

  3. 3Claude Fable 5Anthropic · 5 of 10 boards61.166.9 × 0.913
    • HealthBench Professional0.66066.0×0.743length-adjusted, Anthropic protocol: adaptive thinking at max effort, Claude Opus 4.8 grader, averaged over 5 trials, no tools or custom system prompt (raw 70.3%). Measured as Claude Mythos 5; Anthropic itself prints 66.0 in the Fable 5 column of the Opus 5 card with footnote Mythos 5.
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)88.5288.5×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)56.0756.1×0.911
    • MedXpertQA (MM)80.080.0×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Qwen-run comparison in the Qwen3.8-Max launch post
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)65.065.0×0.507
    Weighted average of 5 boards
    66.9
    Multiplier for 5 of 10 boards
    × 0.913
    Index
    66.9 × 0.913 = 61.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Fable 5

  4. 4Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle · 9 of 10 boards58.058.0 × 1
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)76.1176.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)59.0659.1×0.911
    • MedPIC80.780.7×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    • MedXpertQA (MM)81.381.3×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Meta's Muse Spark launch table (Meta reports the better of vendor self-reports and its own reproduction)
    • MAST (Medical AI Superintelligence Test)58.958.9×0.995
    • MedHELM0.65265.2×0.87
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)62.662.6×0.507
    • PhysicianBench6.06.0×0.79
    • EHR-Complex0.63063.0×0.875validation configuration
    Weighted average of 9 boards
    58.0
    Multiplier for 9 of 10 boards
    × 1
    Index
    58.0 × 1 = 58.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3.1 Pro

  5. 5Muse SparkMeta · 5 of 10 boards56.161.4 × 0.913
    • HealthBench Professional0.54154.1×0.743length-normalized, GPT-5.4 low-reasoning grader; Muse Spark (1.0) column in the Muse Spark 1.1 Evaluation Report Figure 44
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)85.9085.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID meta/muse_spark; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)51.3151.3×0.911model ID meta/muse_spark; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedXpertQA (MM)78.478.4×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Meta's Muse Spark launch table (Meta reports the better of vendor self-reports and its own reproduction)
    • MedHELM0.62162.1×0.87
    Weighted average of 5 boards
    61.4
    Multiplier for 5 of 10 boards
    × 0.913
    Index
    61.4 × 0.913 = 56.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Muse Spark

  6. 6GPT-5OpenAI · 5 of 10 boards54.159.3 × 0.913
    • HealthBench Professional0.46246.2×0.743length-adjusted, max reasoning effort, GPT-5.6 system card Table 6 column GPT-5 (51.0 unadjusted, 3616 chars)
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)83.6583.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-5-2025-08-07; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)49.6349.6×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5-2025-08-07; reasoning_effort=high; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedPIC75.675.6×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)68.668.6×0.507from the Model Leaderboard SAFETY column (NOHARM v2 F1 weighted, shown with CI); not in the Latest Flagships ranking
    Weighted average of 5 boards
    59.3
    Multiplier for 5 of 10 boards
    × 0.913
    Index
    59.3 × 0.913 = 54.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5

  7. 7GPT-5.2OpenAI · 5 of 10 boards53.658.7 × 0.913
    • HealthBench Professional0.45945.9×0.743length-adjusted, max reasoning effort, GPT-5.6 system card Table 6 column GPT-5.2 (50.0 unadjusted, 3400 chars)
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)84.3984.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-5.2-2025-12-11; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=xhigh
    • MedCode (Vals AI)49.7549.8×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5.2-2025-12-11; reasoning_effort=xhigh; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedPIC68.168.1×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    • MedXpertQA (MM)73.373.3×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Qwen-run comparison in the Qwen3.5-397B-A17B model card
    Weighted average of 5 boards
    58.7
    Multiplier for 5 of 10 boards
    × 0.913
    Index
    58.7 × 0.913 = 53.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.2

  8. 8Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic · 4 of 10 boards52.264.0 × 0.816
    • HealthBench Professional0.69269.2×0.743Anthropic; max effort; Opus 4.8 grader; safety classifiers enabled; length-adjusted; raw 77.1%
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)91.1091.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=128000; compute_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)52.9252.9×0.911model ID anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5; compute_effort=max; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=128000
    • PhysicianBench63.263.2×0.79Anthropic harness; 100 tasks; pass@1; max effort; Opus 5 rubric grader; safety classifiers enabled
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    64.0
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    64.0 × 0.816 = 52.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Sonnet 5.5

  9. 9GPT-5.4OpenAI · 7 of 10 boards51.851.8 × 1
    • HealthBench Professional0.48148.1×0.743length-adjusted, max reasoning effort, GPT-5.6 system card Table 6 column GPT-5.4 (51.9 unadjusted, 3308 chars)
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)77.5577.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-5.4-2026-03-05; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=xhigh
    • MedCode (Vals AI)41.2941.3×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5.4-2026-03-05; reasoning_effort=xhigh; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedXpertQA (MM)77.177.1×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Meta's Muse Spark launch table (Meta reports the better of vendor self-reports and its own reproduction)
    • MedHELM0.53853.8×0.87
    • PhysicianBench27.727.7×0.79
    • EHR-Complex0.65065.0×0.875average over 12 intent columns; run as human-validation configuration, not in the headline 12-model table
    Weighted average of 7 boards
    51.8
    Multiplier for 7 of 10 boards
    × 1
    Index
    51.8 × 1 = 51.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.4

  10. 10Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic · 4 of 10 boards51.863.5 × 0.816
    • HealthBench Professional0.65665.6×0.743Anthropic; adaptive max effort; Opus 4.8 grader; five trials; no tools or custom system prompt; safety classifiers and refusal fallback to Opus 5; length-adjusted; raw 77.1%
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)91.4391.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-opus-5-5; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=128000; compute_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)49.8049.8×0.911model ID anthropic/claude-opus-5-5; compute_effort=max; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=128000
    • PhysicianBench68.468.4×0.79Anthropic harness; 100 tasks; pass@1; max effort; Opus 5 rubric grader; safety classifiers enabled
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    63.5
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    63.5 × 0.816 = 51.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Opus 5.5

All 149 modelsTop 10 only
  1. 11GPT-5.5OpenAI · 5 of 10 boards50.555.3 × 0.913
    • HealthBench Professional0.51851.8×0.743length-adjusted, max reasoning effort, GPT-5.6 system card Table 6 column GPT-5.5 (57.2 unadjusted, 3818 chars)
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)86.8786.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)49.1049.1×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5.5; reasoning_effort=xhigh; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)70.070.0×0.507
    • PhysicianBench46.346.3×0.79pass@1; Pass^3 28.0
    Weighted average of 5 boards
    55.3
    Multiplier for 5 of 10 boards
    × 0.913
    Index
    55.3 × 0.913 = 50.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.5

  2. 12Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic · 4 of 10 boards50.361.6 × 0.816
    • HealthBench Professional0.62162.1×0.743length-adjusted (method published in the HealthBench Professional paper); Anthropic protocol: adaptive thinking at max effort, Claude Opus 4.8 grader, averaged over five trials, no tools or customized system prompt; Fable 5.1 run with safety classifiers active and a refusal-fallback to Claude Opus 5 (raw 74.2%).
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)91.2991.3×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)53.5153.5×0.911
    • PhysicianBench61.061.0×0.79Anthropic harness; 100 tasks; pass@1; max effort; Opus 5 rubric grader; safety classifiers enabled
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    61.6
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    61.6 × 0.816 = 50.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Fable 5.1

  3. 13Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · 4 of 10 boards50.361.6 × 0.816
    • HealthBench Professional0.57457.4×0.743Anthropic June evaluation; length-adjusted; adaptive max effort; Opus 4.8 grader; five trials; no tools or custom system prompt
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)85.7585.8×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-opus-4-8; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; compute_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)53.2253.2×0.911
    • MedXpertQA (MM)71.771.7×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Qwen-run comparison in the Qwen3.8-Max launch post
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    61.6
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    61.6 × 0.816 = 50.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Opus 4.8

  4. 14Qwen3.5 397B A17BAlibaba · 4 of 10 boards50.361.7 × 0.816
    • MedXpertQA (MM)70.070.0×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463self-reported in the Qwen3.5-397B-A17B model card
    • MAST (Medical AI Superintelligence Test)57.957.9×0.995
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)61.161.1×0.507
    • EHR-Complex0.62062.0×0.875headline evaluation
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    61.7
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    61.7 × 0.816 = 50.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3.5 397B A17B

  5. 15Muse Spark 1.1Meta · 3 of 10 boards50.371.1 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.59359.3×0.743length-normalized, GPT-5.4 low-reasoning grader, xhigh reasoning via Meta Model API (Muse Spark 1.1 Evaluation Report Figure 44)
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)88.8988.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)79.779.7×0.507
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    71.1
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    71.1 × 0.707 = 50.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Muse Spark 1.1

  6. 16Kimi K3Moonshot AI · 4 of 10 boards50.261.5 × 0.816
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)87.9688.0×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)48.8848.9×0.911model ID kimi/kimi-k3; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MAST (Medical AI Superintelligence Test)60.160.1×0.995
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)74.074.0×0.507
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    61.5
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    61.5 × 0.816 = 50.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Kimi K3

  7. 17Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle · 6 of 10 boards50.150.1 × 1
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)73.5573.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-2.5-pro; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)50.5950.6×0.911model ID google/gemini-2.5-pro; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedPIC54.454.4×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    • MedHELM0.52952.9×0.87
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)61.961.9×0.507
    • EHR-Complex0.31031.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    Weighted average of 6 boards
    50.1
    Multiplier for 6 of 10 boards
    × 1
    Index
    50.1 × 1 = 50.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 2.5 Pro

  8. 18Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · 5 of 10 boards47.351.8 × 0.913
    • HealthBench Professional0.57857.8×0.743length-adjusted, Anthropic protocol: adaptive thinking at max effort, Claude Opus 4.8 grader, averaged over 5 trials, no tools or custom system prompt (raw 62.4%).
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)76.0576.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-sonnet-5; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; compute_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)47.5447.5×0.911model ID anthropic/claude-sonnet-5; compute_effort=max; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MAST (Medical AI Superintelligence Test)56.656.6×0.995
    • PhysicianBench37.437.4×0.79Anthropic harness; 100 tasks; pass@1; max effort; Opus 5 rubric grader; safety classifiers enabled
    Weighted average of 5 boards
    51.8
    Multiplier for 5 of 10 boards
    × 0.913
    Index
    51.8 × 0.913 = 47.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Sonnet 5

  9. 19Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI · 4 of 10 boards45.555.8 × 0.816
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)76.4476.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID kimi/kimi-k2.5-thinking; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)39.3239.3×0.911model ID kimi/kimi-k2.5-thinking; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedXpertQA (MM)65.365.3×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Qwen-run comparison in the Qwen3.5-397B-A17B model card (K2.5-1T-A32B column)
    • EHR-Complex0.62062.0×0.875headline 12-model evaluation, top open-weight
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    55.8
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    55.8 × 0.816 = 45.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Kimi K2.5

  10. 20Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic · 5 of 10 boards44.849.1 × 0.913
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)86.7486.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)49.1349.1×0.911model ID anthropic/claude-opus-4-6-thinking; compute_effort=max; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedXpertQA (MM)64.864.8×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Meta's Muse Spark launch table (Meta reports the better of vendor self-reports and its own reproduction)
    • MedHELM0.45645.6×0.87
    • PhysicianBench31.731.7×0.79Pass^3 18.0
    Weighted average of 5 boards
    49.1
    Multiplier for 5 of 10 boards
    × 0.913
    Index
    49.1 × 0.913 = 44.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Opus 4.6

  11. 21GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · 3 of 10 boards44.062.2 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.70370.3×0.743Anthropic public-API reproduction; max effort; no system prompt; Opus 4.8 grader; length-adjusted; raw 74.0%
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)87.9187.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)48.4948.5×0.911
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    62.2
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    62.2 × 0.707 = 44.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-6 Astra

  12. 22Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle · 3 of 10 boards43.862.0 × 0.707
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)76.5776.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-3.5-flash; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)55.8355.8×0.911
    • MedHELM0.64264.2×0.87
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    62.0
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    62.0 × 0.707 = 43.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3.5 Flash

  13. 23Gemini 3 ProGoogle · 2 of 10 boards43.074.6 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)72.0472.0×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-3-pro-preview; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedXpertQA (MM)76.076.0×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Qwen3.5 model card comparison; source-specific evaluation, not harmonized across vendors
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    74.6
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    74.6 × 0.577 = 43.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3 Pro

  14. 24GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI · 3 of 10 boards42.359.8 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.64264.2×0.743OpenAI; length-adjusted; 64.2 (67.2, 3038) (adjusted, raw, mean response characters); addendum Table 7 refers to the GPT-6 Astra card for method
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)86.4586.5×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-6.1-sol; max_output_tokens=128000; reasoning_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)48.8448.8×0.911model ID openai/gpt-6.1-sol; reasoning_effort=max; max_output_tokens=128000
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    59.8
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    59.8 × 0.707 = 42.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-6.1 Sol

  15. 25Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle · 3 of 10 boards41.859.1 × 0.707
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)79.6679.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-3.6-flash; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)53.1553.2×0.911
    • MAST (Medical AI Superintelligence Test)59.359.3×0.995
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    59.1
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    59.1 × 0.707 = 41.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3.6 Flash

  16. 26Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic · 3 of 10 boards41.658.9 × 0.707
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)85.3285.3×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-opus-4-5-20251101-thinking; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; compute_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)49.1649.2×0.911model ID anthropic/claude-opus-4-5-20251101-thinking; compute_effort=high; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedXpertQA (MM)63.663.6×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Qwen3.5 model card comparison; source-specific evaluation, not harmonized across vendors
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    58.9
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    58.9 × 0.707 = 41.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Opus 4.5

  17. 27Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba · 3 of 10 boards41.658.8 × 0.707
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)84.9585.0×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID alibaba/qwen3.8-max; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)40.6740.7×0.911model ID alibaba/qwen3.8-max; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedXpertQA (MM)80.480.4×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Alibaba's own Qwen3.8 launch table; protocol not stated
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    58.8
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    58.8 × 0.707 = 41.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3.8 Max

  18. 28Grok 4.7SpaceX AI · 3 of 10 boards40.757.6 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.56756.7×0.743SpaceXAI evaluation; xHigh effort; HealthBench Professional
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)89.3889.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID grok/grok-4.7; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; reasoning_effort=xhigh
    • MedCode (Vals AI)49.5549.6×0.911model ID grok/grok-4.7; reasoning_effort=xhigh; temperature=1; top_p=0.95
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    57.6
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    57.6 × 0.707 = 40.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4.7

  19. 29GPT-6 SolOpenAI · 3 of 10 boards40.357.0 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.60860.8×0.743OpenAI; length-adjusted; maximum reasoning effort; 60.8 (59.5, 1573) (adjusted, raw, mean response characters)
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)82.0382.0×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-6-sol; max_output_tokens=128000; reasoning_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)47.0747.1×0.911model ID openai/gpt-6-sol; reasoning_effort=max; max_output_tokens=128000
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    57.0
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    57.0 × 0.707 = 40.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-6 Sol

  20. 30Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic · 4 of 10 boards40.149.2 × 0.816
    • HealthBench Professional0.51951.9×0.743length-adjusted; adaptive thinking at max effort; Claude Sonnet 4.6 grader; 5 trials; comparison model in the Opus 4.8 card
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)82.9583.0×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-opus-4-7; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; compute_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)54.8654.9×0.911
    • PhysicianBench29.329.3×0.79Pass^3 18.0
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    49.2
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    49.2 × 0.816 = 40.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Opus 4.7

  21. 31GPT-6 LunaOpenAI · 3 of 10 boards39.756.1 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.60860.8×0.743OpenAI; length-adjusted; maximum reasoning effort; 60.8 (61.2, 2119) (adjusted, raw, mean response characters)
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)83.7183.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-6-luna; max_output_tokens=128000; reasoning_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)44.6944.7×0.911model ID openai/gpt-6-luna; reasoning_effort=max; max_output_tokens=128000
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    56.1
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    56.1 × 0.707 = 39.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-6 Luna

  22. 32GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI · 3 of 10 boards38.354.2 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.57757.7×0.743length-adjusted, max reasoning effort (62.4 unadjusted, 3,618 mean response chars); GPT-5.6 system card Table 6, column GPT-5.6-TERRA.
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)82.8782.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-5.6-terra; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=xhigh
    • MedCode (Vals AI)43.4143.4×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5.6-terra; reasoning_effort=xhigh; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    54.2
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    54.2 × 0.707 = 38.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.6 Terra

  23. 33GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI · 3 of 10 boards37.553.1 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.55755.7×0.743length-adjusted, max reasoning effort (59.8 unadjusted, 3,389 mean response chars); GPT-5.6 system card Table 6, column GPT-5.6-LUNA. API max-effort setting, not the August ChatGPT production setting measured in row 493.
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)84.3984.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-5.6-luna; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)42.3942.4×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5.6-luna; reasoning_effort=max; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    53.1
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    53.1 × 0.707 = 37.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.6 Luna

  24. 34GPT-5.1OpenAI · 3 of 10 boards36.952.2 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.39639.6×0.743length-adjusted, max reasoning effort, GPT-5.6 system card Table 6 column GPT-5.1 (48.0 unadjusted, 4863 chars)
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)88.0988.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)52.7352.7×0.911
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    52.2
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    52.2 × 0.707 = 36.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.1

  25. 35Grok 4.6SpaceX AI · 3 of 10 boards36.651.7 × 0.707
    • HealthBench Professional0.48548.5×0.743SpaceXAI evaluation; High effort; HealthBench Professional
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)86.5386.5×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)44.7144.7×0.911model ID grok/grok-4.6; reasoning_effort=high; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    51.7
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    51.7 × 0.707 = 36.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4.6

  26. 36GLM 5.3 FlashZhipu · 1 of 10 boards36.388.9 × 0.408
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)88.9488.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID zai/glm-5.3-flash; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=max
    One board, so its score
    88.9
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    88.9 × 0.408 = 36.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GLM 5.3 Flash

  27. 37DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek · 4 of 10 boards36.244.4 × 0.816
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)80.1780.2×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)42.4742.5×0.911model ID deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813; reasoning_effort=max; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedPIC71.771.7×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    • PhysicianBench18.718.7×0.79Pass@1 over 3 runs; Pass^3 6.0; shared FHIR tool harness; up to 100 turns; high reasoning when supported
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    44.4
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    44.4 × 0.816 = 36.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for DeepSeek V4 Pro

  28. 38GLM 5.1Zhipu · 3 of 10 boards36.251.2 × 0.707
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)72.2772.3×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID zai/glm-5.1; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)41.6041.6×0.911model ID zai/glm-5.1; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)57.957.9×0.507First Do NOHARM v2 overall; preview; open-weight model; run date unpublished
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    51.2
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    51.2 × 0.707 = 36.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GLM 5.1

  29. 39Grok 4.3SpaceX AI · 3 of 10 boards35.049.5 × 0.707
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4074.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID grok/grok-4.3; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)38.0738.1×0.911model ID grok/grok-4.3; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MAST (Medical AI Superintelligence Test)53.753.7×0.995
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    49.5
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    49.5 × 0.707 = 35.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4.3

  30. 40Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle · 2 of 10 boards34.660.0 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)83.9483.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-3.7-flash; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)53.3953.4×0.911model ID google/gemini-3.7-flash; reasoning_effort=high; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    60.0
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    60.0 × 0.577 = 34.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3.7 Flash

  31. 41Gemini 3 FlashGoogle · 2 of 10 boards34.058.9 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)69.9269.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-3-flash-preview; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)55.9255.9×0.911
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    58.9
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    58.9 × 0.577 = 34.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3 Flash

  32. 42Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · 1 of 10 boards33.983.0 × 0.408
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)82.9883.0×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-2.5-flash-thinking; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    One board, so its score
    83.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    83.0 × 0.408 = 33.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 2.5 Flash

  33. 43Muse Spark 1.2Meta · 2 of 10 boards33.658.2 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)90.0690.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)49.3549.4×0.911model ID meta/muse_spark_1_2; reasoning_effort=xhigh; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    58.2
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    58.2 × 0.577 = 33.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Muse Spark 1.2

  34. 44Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI · 4 of 10 boards33.040.5 × 0.816
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)78.1578.2×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID kimi/kimi-k2.6; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)40.1440.1×0.911model ID kimi/kimi-k2.6; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)59.159.1×0.507
    • PhysicianBench17.017.0×0.79open source
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    40.5
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    40.5 × 0.816 = 33.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Kimi K2.6

  35. 45DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek · 1 of 10 boards32.880.4 × 0.408
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)80.3680.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    One board, so its score
    80.4
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    80.4 × 0.408 = 32.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for DeepSeek V4 Flash

  36. 46Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba · 4 of 10 boards32.339.6 × 0.816
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)76.9677.0×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID alibaba/qwen3.6-plus; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)36.8936.9×0.911model ID alibaba/qwen3.6-plus; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedXpertQA (MM)68.768.7×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Qwen-run comparison in the Qwen3.7-Plus launch post
    • PhysicianBench13.713.7×0.79
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    39.6
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    39.6 × 0.816 = 32.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3.6 Plus

  37. 47Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle · 2 of 10 boards32.355.9 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5084.5×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-3.8-flash; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=65536; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)48.1348.1×0.911model ID google/gemini-3.8-flash; reasoning_effort=high; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=65536
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    55.9
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    55.9 × 0.577 = 32.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3.8 Flash

  38. 48Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · 4 of 10 boards32.139.3 × 0.816
    • HealthBench Professional0.44244.2×0.743length-adjusted; Anthropic protocol: adaptive thinking at max effort, Claude Opus 4.8 grader, averaged over 5 trials, no tools or custom system prompt; comparison column in the Sonnet 5 card. Other Anthropic prints: 44.4% (Fable card Figure 8.18.2.A), 41.7% (Opus 4.8 card, Sonnet 4.6 grader)
    • MedPIC64.264.2×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    • PhysicianBench23.023.0×0.79
    • EHR-Complex0.36036.0×0.875validation configuration
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    39.3
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    39.3 × 0.816 = 32.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Sonnet 4.6

  39. 49MiniMax M3MiniMax · 2 of 10 boards31.855.1 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)87.2587.3×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25
    • MedCode (Vals AI)46.2946.3×0.911model ID minimax/MiniMax-M3; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    55.1
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    55.1 × 0.577 = 31.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MiniMax M3

  40. 50MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomi · 2 of 10 boards31.354.3 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)88.3188.3×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=128000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)44.9745.0×0.911model ID xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=128000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    54.3
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    54.3 × 0.577 = 31.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MiMo V2.6 Pro

  41. 51Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic · 2 of 10 boards30.953.6 × 0.577
    • HealthBench Professional0.64864.8×0.743Anthropic; max effort; Opus 4.8 grader; safety classifiers enabled; length-adjusted; raw 71.0%; five runs (October 1 and 2); thirteen repeat max runs on October 4 averaged 64.2%
    • PhysicianBench43.043.0×0.79Anthropic harness; 100 tasks; pass@1; max effort; Opus 5 rubric grader; safety classifiers enabled; five attempts per task; run October 1 and 2
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    53.6
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    53.6 × 0.577 = 30.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Haiku 5.5

  42. 52o3OpenAI · 2 of 10 boards30.953.6 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)76.6576.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/o3-2025-04-16; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)47.2947.3×0.911model ID openai/o3-2025-04-16; reasoning_effort=high; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    53.6
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    53.6 × 0.577 = 30.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for o3

  43. 53Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic · 2 of 10 boards30.552.9 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)73.9073.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-opus-4-1-20250805-thinking; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)47.2347.2×0.911model ID anthropic/claude-opus-4-1-20250805-thinking; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    52.9
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    52.9 × 0.577 = 30.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Opus 4.1

  44. 54Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic · 2 of 10 boards30.552.8 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5284.5×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)44.1344.1×0.911model ID anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-thinking; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    52.8
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    52.8 × 0.577 = 30.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Sonnet 4.5

  45. 55GLM 5.3Zhipu · 2 of 10 boards30.552.8 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)88.8188.8×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID zai/glm-5.3; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=max
    • MedCode (Vals AI)42.8642.9×0.911model ID zai/glm-5.3; reasoning_effort=max; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    52.8
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    52.8 × 0.577 = 30.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GLM 5.3

  46. 56Grok 4.5SpaceX AI · 2 of 10 boards30.452.7 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)86.8886.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID grok/grok-4.5; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)43.2943.3×0.911model ID grok/grok-4.5; reasoning_effort=high; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    52.7
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    52.7 × 0.577 = 30.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4.5

  47. 57Hy4 PreviewTencent · 2 of 10 boards30.052.0 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)83.6083.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID tencent/hy4-preview; temperature=1; top_p=1; max_output_tokens=64000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)43.2543.3×0.911model ID tencent/hy4-preview; temperature=1; top_p=1; max_output_tokens=64000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    52.0
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    52.0 × 0.577 = 30.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Hy4 Preview

  48. 58DeepSeek R1DeepSeek · 2 of 10 boards29.551.2 × 0.577
    • MedHELM0.48548.5×0.87
    • First, Do NOHARM (v2)55.855.8×0.507
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    51.2
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    51.2 × 0.577 = 29.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for DeepSeek R1

  49. 59Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle · 2 of 10 boards29.551.1 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)63.9063.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)47.6047.6×0.911model ID google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview; reasoning_effort=high; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    51.1
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    51.1 × 0.577 = 29.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

  50. 60GPT-5 miniOpenAI · 2 of 10 boards29.551.2 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)80.5880.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)43.0543.1×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07; reasoning_effort=high; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    51.2
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    51.2 × 0.577 = 29.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5 mini

  51. 61Qwen3.5-PlusAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards29.572.4 × 0.408
    • MedPIC72.472.4×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    72.4
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    72.4 × 0.408 = 29.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3.5-Plus

  52. 62DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · 2 of 10 boards29.350.7 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)85.5085.5×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash; max_output_tokens=384000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)41.1741.2×0.911model ID deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash; reasoning_effort=high; max_output_tokens=384000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    50.7
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    50.7 × 0.577 = 29.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

  53. 63InklingThinking Machines · 2 of 10 boards29.350.7 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)85.4185.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID thinkingmachines/inkling; temperature=1; top_p=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=0.99
    • MedCode (Vals AI)41.1941.2×0.911model ID thinkingmachines/inkling; reasoning_effort=0.99; temperature=1; top_p=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    50.7
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    50.7 × 0.577 = 29.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Inkling

  54. 64MiMo V2.6 FlashXiaomi · 2 of 10 boards29.250.6 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2885.3×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=128000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)41.0641.1×0.911model ID xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=128000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    50.6
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    50.6 × 0.577 = 29.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MiMo V2.6 Flash

  55. 65Qwen3.7 PlusAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards29.071.0 × 0.408
    • MedXpertQA (MM)71.071.0×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Alibaba's own Qwen3.7 Plus launch table; protocol not stated
    One board, so its score
    71.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    71.0 × 0.408 = 29.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3.7 Plus

  56. 66GLM 5.2Zhipu · 2 of 10 boards28.950.0 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)83.5383.5×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID zai/glm-5.2; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)40.7740.8×0.911model ID zai/glm-5.2; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    50.0
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    50.0 × 0.577 = 28.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GLM 5.2

  57. 67GPT OSS 120BOpenAI · 1 of 10 boards28.870.7 × 0.408
    • MedPIC70.770.7×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    70.7
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    70.7 × 0.408 = 28.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT OSS 120B

  58. 68Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle · 2 of 10 boards28.549.4 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)70.8970.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)43.4943.5×0.911model ID google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite; reasoning_effort=high; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    49.4
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    49.4 × 0.577 = 28.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

  59. 69Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards28.369.4 × 0.408
    • MedPIC69.469.4×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    69.4
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    69.4 × 0.408 = 28.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3.5-27B

  60. 70GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI · 2 of 10 boards28.248.8 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)77.0977.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-5.4-nano-2026-03-17; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)41.0341.0×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5.4-nano-2026-03-17; reasoning_effort=high; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    48.8
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    48.8 × 0.577 = 28.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.4 nano

  61. 71Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards27.968.5 × 0.408
    • MedPIC68.568.5×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    68.5
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    68.5 × 0.408 = 27.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

  62. 72Inkling SmallThinking Machines · 2 of 10 boards27.647.8 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)84.1184.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID thinkingmachines/inkling-small; temperature=1; top_p=1; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=0.99
    • MedCode (Vals AI)37.8937.9×0.911model ID thinkingmachines/inkling-small; reasoning_effort=0.99; temperature=1; top_p=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    47.8
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    47.8 × 0.577 = 27.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Inkling Small

  63. 73Qwen 3.7 MaxAlibaba · 2 of 10 boards27.447.5 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)79.4079.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID alibaba/qwen3.7-max; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)38.7538.8×0.911model ID alibaba/qwen3.7-max; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    47.5
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    47.5 × 0.577 = 27.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen 3.7 Max

  64. 74Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)SpaceX AI · 2 of 10 boards27.146.9 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)81.6381.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID grok/grok-4-fast-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)37.3837.4×0.911model ID grok/grok-4-fast-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    46.9
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    46.9 × 0.577 = 27.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)

  65. 75Grok 4.20SpaceX AI · 4 of 10 boards27.033.1 × 0.816
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)63.4163.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID grok/grok-4.20-0309-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)32.1632.2×0.911model ID grok/grok-4.20-0309-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedXpertQA (MM)65.865.8×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Meta's Muse Spark launch table (Meta reports the better of vendor self-reports and its own reproduction)
    • PhysicianBench5.35.3×0.79
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    33.1
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    33.1 × 0.816 = 27.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4.20

  66. 76Grok 4SpaceX AI · 2 of 10 boards26.946.7 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)78.1578.2×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID grok/grok-4-0709; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)38.0838.1×0.911model ID grok/grok-4-0709; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    46.7
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    46.7 × 0.577 = 26.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4

  67. 77Qwen3.5-9BAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards26.063.8 × 0.408
    • MedPIC63.863.8×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    63.8
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    63.8 × 0.408 = 26.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3.5-9B

  68. 78MiniMax-M2.1MiniMax · 2 of 10 boards25.544.2 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)80.7880.8×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID minimax/MiniMax-M2.1; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)34.0834.1×0.911model ID minimax/MiniMax-M2.1; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    44.2
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    44.2 × 0.577 = 25.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MiniMax-M2.1

  69. 79Gemma 4 31BGoogle · 1 of 10 boards25.061.3 × 0.408
    • MedXpertQA (MM)61.361.3×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Google model card; MedXPertQA MM row; vendor-reported; protocol differs from other source families
    One board, so its score
    61.3
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    61.3 × 0.408 = 25.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemma 4 31B

  70. 80MedGemma 27B TextGoogle · 1 of 10 boards25.061.2 × 0.408
    • MedPIC61.261.2×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    61.2
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    61.2 × 0.408 = 25.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MedGemma 27B Text

  71. 81Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic · 2 of 10 boards24.943.1 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)72.4172.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)34.9635.0×0.911model ID anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514-thinking; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    43.1
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    43.1 × 0.577 = 24.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Sonnet 4

  72. 82Ling 3.0 FlashAnt Group · 2 of 10 boards24.742.8 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)80.9080.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID ant/ling-3.0-flash-2607; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)32.2732.3×0.911model ID ant/ling-3.0-flash-2607; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    42.8
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    42.8 × 0.577 = 24.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Ling 3.0 Flash

  73. 83Fleming-R1-32BUbiquant · 1 of 10 boards24.760.6 × 0.408
    • MedPIC60.660.6×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    60.6
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    60.6 × 0.408 = 24.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Fleming-R1-32B

  74. 84Lingshu-32BAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards24.359.5 × 0.408
    • MedPIC59.559.5×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    59.5
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    59.5 × 0.408 = 24.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Lingshu-32B

  75. 85DeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDeepSeek · 1 of 10 boards24.159.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.59059.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    One board, so its score
    59.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    59.0 × 0.408 = 24.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

  76. 86GPT OSS 20BOpenAI · 1 of 10 boards24.159.1 × 0.408
    • MedPIC59.159.1×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    59.1
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    59.1 × 0.408 = 24.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT OSS 20B

  77. 87o4-miniOpenAI · 2 of 10 boards23.941.4 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)69.1469.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/o4-mini-2025-04-16; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)33.7933.8×0.911model ID openai/o4-mini-2025-04-16; reasoning_effort=high; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    41.4
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    41.4 × 0.577 = 23.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for o4-mini

  78. 88Qwen 3 VL PlusAlibaba · 2 of 10 boards23.941.5 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)77.1377.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID alibaba/qwen3-vl-plus-2025-09-23; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)31.6531.7×0.911model ID alibaba/qwen3-vl-plus-2025-09-23; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    41.5
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    41.5 × 0.577 = 23.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen 3 VL Plus

  79. 89Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral · 2 of 10 boards23.741.1 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)67.7367.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID mistralai/mistral-medium-3.5; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)33.7533.8×0.911model ID mistralai/mistral-medium-3.5; reasoning_effort=high; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    41.1
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    41.1 × 0.577 = 23.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Mistral Medium 3.5

  80. 90Qwen 3.5 FlashAlibaba · 2 of 10 boards23.741.1 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)70.6270.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID alibaba/qwen3.5-flash; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)33.0033.0×0.911model ID alibaba/qwen3.5-flash; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    41.1
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    41.1 × 0.577 = 23.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen 3.5 Flash

  81. 91Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle · 1 of 10 boards23.758.1 × 0.408
    • MedXpertQA (MM)58.158.1×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Google model card; MedXPertQA MM row; vendor-reported; protocol differs from other source families
    One board, so its score
    58.1
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    58.1 × 0.408 = 23.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemma 4 26B A4B

  82. 92Grok 4 Fast (Non-Reasoning)SpaceX AI · 2 of 10 boards23.540.7 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)79.7279.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID grok/grok-4-fast-non-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)30.0430.0×0.911model ID grok/grok-4-fast-non-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    40.7
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    40.7 × 0.577 = 23.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4 Fast (Non-Reasoning)

  83. 93GLM 4.7Zhipu · 2 of 10 boards23.440.5 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)68.6368.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID zai/glm-4.7; temperature=1; top_p=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)32.7732.8×0.911model ID zai/glm-4.7; temperature=1; top_p=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    40.5
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    40.5 × 0.577 = 23.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GLM 4.7

  84. 94MiMo V2.5Xiaomi · 2 of 10 boards23.440.6 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)72.1572.2×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID xiaomi/mimo-v2.5; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)31.8931.9×0.911model ID xiaomi/mimo-v2.5; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    40.6
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    40.6 × 0.577 = 23.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MiMo V2.5

  85. 95Qwen 3.8 27BAlibaba · 2 of 10 boards23.440.6 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)83.8583.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID alibaba/qwen3.8-27b; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=xhigh
    • MedCode (Vals AI)28.7028.7×0.911model ID alibaba/qwen3.8-27b; reasoning_effort=xhigh; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    40.6
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    40.6 × 0.577 = 23.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen 3.8 27B

  86. 96Llama 4 MaverickMeta · 2 of 10 boards23.340.3 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)54.2254.2×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID fireworks/llama4-maverick-instruct-basic; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)36.5136.5×0.911model ID fireworks/llama4-maverick-instruct-basic; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    40.3
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    40.3 × 0.577 = 23.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Llama 4 Maverick

  87. 97Qwen 3 Max ThinkingAlibaba · 2 of 10 boards23.340.3 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)72.7172.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID alibaba/qwen3-max-2026-01-23; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)31.3731.4×0.911model ID alibaba/qwen3-max-2026-01-23; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    40.3
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    40.3 × 0.577 = 23.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen 3 Max Thinking

  88. 98Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic · 4 of 10 boards23.128.3 × 0.816
    • HealthBench Professional0.32232.2×0.743Anthropic; extended thinking (Haiku 4.5 has no effort setting); Opus 4.8 grader; safety classifiers enabled; length-adjusted; measured for the Haiku 5.5 card
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2385.2×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-thinking; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)32.6832.7×0.911model ID anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-thinking; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • PhysicianBench1.41.4×0.79Anthropic harness; 100 tasks; pass@1; extended thinking (no effort setting); Opus 5 rubric grader; safety classifiers enabled; measured for the Haiku 5.5 card
    Weighted average of 4 boards
    28.3
    Multiplier for 4 of 10 boards
    × 0.816
    Index
    28.3 × 0.816 = 23.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude Haiku 4.5

  89. 99MiMo V2.5 ProXiaomi · 3 of 10 boards23.132.7 × 0.707
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)83.7383.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)32.4832.5×0.911model ID xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • PhysicianBench16.716.7×0.79Pass@1 over 3 runs; Pass^3 6.0; shared FHIR tool harness; up to 100 turns; high reasoning when supported
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    32.7
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    32.7 × 0.707 = 23.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MiMo V2.5 Pro

  90. 100GPT-5 nanoOpenAI · 2 of 10 boards22.839.6 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)72.8672.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID openai/gpt-5-nano-2025-08-07; max_output_tokens=30000; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)30.4430.4×0.911model ID openai/gpt-5-nano-2025-08-07; reasoning_effort=high; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    39.6
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    39.6 × 0.577 = 22.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5 nano

  91. 101DeepSeek-V3.1DeepSeek · 1 of 10 boards22.856.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.56056.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    One board, so its score
    56.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    56.0 × 0.408 = 22.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for DeepSeek-V3.1

  92. 102Ling 3.0 Flash FinAnt Group · 2 of 10 boards22.739.3 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)75.5975.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID ant/ling-3.0-flash-af-rc3; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=131072
    • MedCode (Vals AI)29.3029.3×0.911model ID ant/ling-3.0-flash-af-rc3; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=131072
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    39.3
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    39.3 × 0.577 = 22.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  93. 103Llama 3.1 70BMeta · 1 of 10 boards22.755.7 × 0.408
    • MedPIC55.755.7×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    55.7
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    55.7 × 0.408 = 22.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Llama 3.1 70B

  94. 104Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)SpaceX AI · 2 of 10 boards22.539.0 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)78.7378.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID grok/grok-4-1-fast-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)28.0828.1×0.911model ID grok/grok-4-1-fast-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    39.0
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    39.0 × 0.577 = 22.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)

  95. 105Grok 4.1 Fast Non-ReasoningSpaceX AI · 2 of 10 boards22.539.0 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)77.4677.5×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID grok/grok-4-1-fast-non-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)28.3528.4×0.911model ID grok/grok-4-1-fast-non-reasoning; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    39.0
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    39.0 × 0.577 = 22.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Grok 4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

  96. 106GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI · 1 of 10 boards22.555.2 × 0.408
    One board, so its score
    55.2
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    55.2 × 0.408 = 22.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.4 mini

  97. 107HuatuoGPT-o1-70BFreedomIntelligence · 1 of 10 boards22.555.2 × 0.408
    • MedPIC55.255.2×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    55.2
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    55.2 × 0.408 = 22.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for HuatuoGPT-o1-70B

  98. 108Qwen3-32B-SFTAnt Group · 1 of 10 boards22.455.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.55055.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns; fine-tuned on trajectories from EHR-Complex training set
    One board, so its score
    55.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    55.0 × 0.408 = 22.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3-32B-SFT

  99. 109Gemini 2.5 Flash LiteGoogle · 2 of 10 boards21.737.6 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)75.8275.8×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-09-2025; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)27.1127.1×0.911model ID google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    37.6
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    37.6 × 0.577 = 21.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

  100. 110Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Alibaba · 1 of 10 boards21.653.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.53053.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    One board, so its score
    53.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    53.0 × 0.408 = 21.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

  101. 111Gemini 3 Pro (11/25)Google · 1 of 10 boards21.352.2 × 0.408
    • MedCode (Vals AI)52.2052.2×0.911model ID google/gemini-3-pro-preview; reasoning_effort=high; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    One board, so its score
    52.2
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    52.2 × 0.408 = 21.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 3 Pro (11/25)

  102. 112MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax · 3 of 10 boards21.129.8 × 0.707
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)79.8779.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID minimax/MiniMax-M2.7; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)34.4434.4×0.911model ID minimax/MiniMax-M2.7; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    • PhysicianBench8.78.7×0.79Pass@1 over 3 runs; Pass^3 1.0; shared FHIR tool harness; up to 100 turns; high reasoning when supported
    Weighted average of 3 boards
    29.8
    Multiplier for 3 of 10 boards
    × 0.707
    Index
    29.8 × 0.707 = 21.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MiniMax-M2.7

  103. 113Mercury 2.5Inception · 2 of 10 boards21.036.4 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)55.0955.1×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID inception/mercury-2.5; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=65536; reasoning_effort=high
    • MedCode (Vals AI)31.3331.3×0.911model ID inception/mercury-2.5; reasoning_effort=high; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=65536
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    36.4
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    36.4 × 0.577 = 21.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Mercury 2.5

  104. 114Fleming-R1-7BUbiquant · 1 of 10 boards20.750.7 × 0.408
    • MedPIC50.750.7×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    50.7
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    50.7 × 0.408 = 20.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Fleming-R1-7B

  105. 115GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · 1 of 10 boards20.049.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.49049.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    One board, so its score
    49.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    49.0 × 0.408 = 20.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-4.1 mini

  106. 116Gemma 4 12BGoogle · 1 of 10 boards19.948.7 × 0.408
    • MedXpertQA (MM)48.748.7×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Google's Gemma 4 model card, Unified 12B; protocol not stated
    One board, so its score
    48.7
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    48.7 × 0.408 = 19.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemma 4 12B

  107. 117Baichuan-M2-32BBaichuan · 1 of 10 boards19.547.8 × 0.408
    • MedPIC47.847.8×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    47.8
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    47.8 × 0.408 = 19.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Baichuan-M2-32B

  108. 118Qwen3-VL-235B-A22BAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards19.447.6 × 0.408
    • MedXpertQA (MM)47.647.6×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Qwen3.5 model card comparison; source-specific evaluation, not harmonized across vendors
    One board, so its score
    47.6
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    47.6 × 0.408 = 19.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B

  109. 119GPT-4.1OpenAI · 1 of 10 boards19.247.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.47047.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    One board, so its score
    47.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    47.0 × 0.408 = 19.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-4.1

  110. 120Laguna M.1Poolside · 2 of 10 boards18.632.3 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)65.9165.9×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID poolside/laguna-m.1; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)23.1123.1×0.911model ID poolside/laguna-m.1; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    32.3
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    32.3 × 0.577 = 18.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Laguna M.1

  111. 121Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic · 1 of 10 boards18.445.0 × 0.408
    One board, so its score
    45.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    45.0 × 0.408 = 18.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Claude 3.7 Sonnet

  112. 122Qwen3-14B-SFTAnt Group · 1 of 10 boards18.445.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.45045.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns; fine-tuned on trajectories from EHR-Complex training set
    One board, so its score
    45.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    45.0 × 0.408 = 18.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3-14B-SFT

  113. 123HuatuoGPT-o1-8BFreedomIntelligence · 1 of 10 boards18.144.3 × 0.408
    • MedPIC44.344.3×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    44.3
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    44.3 × 0.408 = 18.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for HuatuoGPT-o1-8B

  114. 124Lingshu-7BAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards17.743.3 × 0.408
    • MedPIC43.343.3×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    43.3
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    43.3 × 0.408 = 17.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Lingshu-7B

  115. 125HealthGPT-Pro-8BZJU4HealthCare · 1 of 10 boards17.442.6 × 0.408
    • MedPIC42.642.6×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    42.6
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    42.6 × 0.408 = 17.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for HealthGPT-Pro-8B

  116. 126Laguna XS.2Poolside · 2 of 10 boards17.329.9 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)61.4361.4×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID poolside/laguna-xs.2; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)21.2521.3×0.911model ID poolside/laguna-xs.2; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    29.9
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    29.9 × 0.577 = 17.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Laguna XS.2

  117. 127Hulu-Med-7BZJU-AI4H · 1 of 10 boards17.142.0 × 0.408
    • MedPIC42.042.0×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    42.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    42.0 × 0.408 = 17.1

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Hulu-Med-7B

  118. 128DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek · 1 of 10 boards16.941.4 × 0.408
    • MedCode (Vals AI)41.4141.4×0.911model ID deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731; reasoning_effort=high; max_output_tokens=30000
    One board, so its score
    41.4
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    41.4 × 0.408 = 16.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

  119. 129Llama 4 ScoutMeta · 2 of 10 boards16.829.2 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)50.5950.6×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID together/meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)23.3123.3×0.911model ID together/meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    29.2
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    29.2 × 0.577 = 16.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Llama 4 Scout

  120. 130Gemini 2.5 Flash (7/17)Google · 1 of 10 boards16.540.4 × 0.408
    • MedCode (Vals AI)40.3640.4×0.911model ID google/gemini-2.5-flash-thinking; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    One board, so its score
    40.4
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    40.4 × 0.408 = 16.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 2.5 Flash (7/17)

  121. 131Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25)Google · 1 of 10 boards16.540.5 × 0.408
    • MedCode (Vals AI)40.5440.5×0.911model ID google/gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    One board, so its score
    40.5
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    40.5 × 0.408 = 16.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25)

  122. 132Gemma 3 27BGoogle · 1 of 10 boards16.440.3 × 0.408
    • MedPIC40.340.3×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    40.3
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    40.3 × 0.408 = 16.4

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemma 3 27B

  123. 133Llama 3.1 8BMeta · 1 of 10 boards16.340.0 × 0.408
    • MedPIC40.040.0×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    40.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    40.0 × 0.408 = 16.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Llama 3.1 8B

  124. 134Gemma 3 12BGoogle · 1 of 10 boards16.239.6 × 0.408
    • MedPIC39.639.6×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    39.6
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    39.6 × 0.408 = 16.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemma 3 12B

  125. 135MedGemma 4BGoogle · 1 of 10 boards16.239.6 × 0.408
    • MedPIC39.639.6×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    39.6
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    39.6 × 0.408 = 16.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MedGemma 4B

  126. 136Command A+Cohere · 2 of 10 boards15.927.5 × 0.577
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)55.6855.7×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID cohere/command-a-plus-05-2026; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=64000
    • MedCode (Vals AI)19.7219.7×0.911model ID cohere/command-a-plus-05-2026; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=64000
    Weighted average of 2 boards
    27.5
    Multiplier for 2 of 10 boards
    × 0.577
    Index
    27.5 × 0.577 = 15.9

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Command A+

  127. 137GPT-5.5 InstantOpenAI · 1 of 10 boards15.738.4 × 0.408
    • HealthBench Professional0.38438.4×0.743length-adjusted (40.7 unadjusted, 2,775 mean response chars); GPT-5.5 Instant system card Table 5, column GPT-5.5 INSTANT.
    One board, so its score
    38.4
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    38.4 × 0.408 = 15.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-5.5 Instant

  128. 138Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA · 1 of 10 boards15.738.6 × 0.408
    • MedCode (Vals AI)38.6238.6×0.911model ID nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    One board, so its score
    38.6
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    38.6 × 0.408 = 15.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Nemotron 3 Ultra

  129. 139HealthGPT-Pro-4BZJU4HealthCare · 1 of 10 boards14.736.0 × 0.408
    • MedPIC36.036.0×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    One board, so its score
    36.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    36.0 × 0.408 = 14.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for HealthGPT-Pro-4B

  130. 140Qwen3-32BAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards14.736.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.36036.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    One board, so its score
    36.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    36.0 × 0.408 = 14.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3-32B

  131. 141MAI-Thinking-1Microsoft · 1 of 10 boards14.335.0 × 0.408
    • HealthBench Professional0.35035.0×0.743length-adjusted (HealthBench Professional length penalty), standard GPT-5.4 grader and OpenAI rubrics, Microsoft AI run; printed at integer precision.
    One board, so its score
    35.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    35.0 × 0.408 = 14.3

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for MAI-Thinking-1

  132. 142Gemini 2.0 FlashGoogle · 1 of 10 boards14.034.2 × 0.408
    One board, so its score
    34.2
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    34.2 × 0.408 = 14.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 2.0 Flash

  133. 143Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (9/25)Google · 1 of 10 boards14.034.2 × 0.408
    • MedCode (Vals AI)34.1934.2×0.911model ID google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite-preview-09-2025-thinking; temperature=1; max_output_tokens=30000
    One board, so its score
    34.2
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    34.2 × 0.408 = 14.0

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (9/25)

  134. 144GPT-4oOpenAI · 1 of 10 boards12.631.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.31031.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    One board, so its score
    31.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    31.0 × 0.408 = 12.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for GPT-4o

  135. 145Qwen3-14BAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards12.230.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.30030.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    One board, so its score
    30.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    30.0 × 0.408 = 12.2

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3-14B

  136. 146Gemma 4 E4BGoogle · 1 of 10 boards11.728.7 × 0.408
    • MedXpertQA (MM)28.728.7×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Google model card; MedXPertQA MM row; vendor-reported; protocol differs from other source families
    One board, so its score
    28.7
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    28.7 × 0.408 = 11.7

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemma 4 E4B

  137. 147Gemma 4 E2BGoogle · 1 of 10 boards9.623.5 × 0.408
    • MedXpertQA (MM)23.523.5×0.463, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 81.5, weight 0.463Google model card; MedXPertQA MM row; vendor-reported; protocol differs from other source families
    One board, so its score
    23.5
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    23.5 × 0.408 = 9.6

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Gemma 4 E2B

  138. 148Qwen3-4BAlibaba · 1 of 10 boards6.516.0 × 0.408
    • EHR-Complex0.16016.0×0.875Table 3; macro-average across 12 intent/scope columns; temperature 0; up to 50 SQL/Python interaction turns
    One board, so its score
    16.0
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    16.0 × 0.408 = 6.5

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Qwen3-4B

  139. 149Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA · 1 of 10 boards1.84.3 × 0.408
    • MedScribe (Vals AI)4.274.3×0.25, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 91.4, weight 0.25model ID fireworks/nemotron-lightning-3p5-30b-a3b; temperature=1; top_p=0.95; max_output_tokens=30000
    One board, so its score
    4.3
    Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
    × 0.408
    Index
    4.3 × 0.408 = 1.8

    Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

    Every result for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Pips: the 10 index boards, filled where the model has a result. Bar: index. Line: weighted average before the multiplier. Select a row for its working.

How each score is made

Every model with a result on an index board is ranked. Each result counts on its board’s own 0 to 100 scale, so a board’s leader keeps the score it got. A board whose leader is already near 100 leaves little room to tell models apart, so boards near their ceiling count for less: weight is the board's headroom (100 minus its leader's score) over 40, between 0.25 and 1. A model’s average is the weighted mean of its board scores, multiplied down when it rests on fewer than six boards. The ranks are the ones the index published; a filter hides models and never changes a rank.

Boards behind a score and its multiplier
Boards123456+
Multiplier× 0.408× 0.577× 0.707× 0.816× 0.913× 1

A row’s working lists every board with its result, its 0 to 100 score, its weight and its setting, then the weighted average and the multiplier. The full method is on the method page.

Blended list price per million tokens, 3 parts input to 1 part output. Log scale.

78 of 149 models

020406080100$0.01$0.03$0.1$0.3$1$3$10$30$100

The line joins models that no cheaper model beats on the index.

What the index is built from

10 boards with results from at least 5 models each, listed by the kind of clinical work. A board counts for less when its leader is close to 100; each weight below 1 is shown.

Not used: HealthAgentBench, CHI-Bench and HealthAdminBench (fewer than 5 models).

1–2 of 13