Clinical Benchmarks
Menu

Hulu-Med-7B

Released 8 Oct 202532K context7Bopen

7 results on 1 of 13 boards, 6 of them on secondary measures, latest measured Aug 2026. Compare with other models

Clinical Benchmarks Index17.1Rank 127 of 1491 of 10 boardsAverage × multiplier 42.0 × 0.408 = 17.1This site’s own calculation. Working How it is computed

Results

Each line sits on its own board's scale. Tall tick: the board leader.

Safety

  1. MedPIC
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    42.0
    Rank 23 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 80.7
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026

Index working

The Clinical Benchmarks Index is this site's own calculation: a weighted average of the board scores times a multiplier for the boards behind it. How it is computed

  • MedPIC42.042.0×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
One board, so its score
42.0
Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
× 0.408
Index
42.0 × 0.408 = 17.1

Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

Secondary measures

Safety

  1. MedPIC, Risk deactivation accuracy
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    38.2
    Rank 14 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 77.9
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  2. MedPIC, Linked counterfactual pair accuracy
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    14.6
    Rank 17 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 48.3
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  3. MedPIC, Guideline-following accuracy (GF)
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    48.2
    Rank 23 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 87.7
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  4. MedPIC, Counterfactual accuracy (CF)
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    32.2
    Rank 25 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 69.9
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  5. MedPIC, Risk activation accuracy
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    36.6
    Rank 27 of 28Leader MedGemma-27B-Text 76.1
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  6. MedPIC, Published GF-minus-CF accuracy gap
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    16.0
    Descriptive measure, not ranked
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026

Sources

The quote, page and document for each of the 7 results
  1. 23MedPIC zero-shot 42.0
    Printed as 42.0Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Hulu-Med-7B, column Overall; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Hulu-Med-7B | 42.0 | 48.2 | 32.2 | 16.0 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 14.6
    Every result from this document
  2. 23MedPIC, Guideline-following accuracy (GF) zero-shot 48.2
    Printed as 48.2Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Hulu-Med-7B, column GF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Hulu-Med-7B | 42.0 | 48.2 | 32.2 | 16.0 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 14.6
    Every result from this document
  3. 25MedPIC, Counterfactual accuracy (CF) zero-shot 32.2
    Printed as 32.2Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Hulu-Med-7B, column CF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Hulu-Med-7B | 42.0 | 48.2 | 32.2 | 16.0 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 14.6
    Every result from this document
  4. 17MedPIC, Linked counterfactual pair accuracy zero-shot 14.6
    Printed as 14.6Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Hulu-Med-7B, column Pair; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Hulu-Med-7B | 42.0 | 48.2 | 32.2 | 16.0 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 14.6
    Every result from this document
  5. 27MedPIC, Risk activation accuracy zero-shot 36.6
    Printed as 36.6Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Hulu-Med-7B, column Activation; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Hulu-Med-7B | 42.0 | 48.2 | 32.2 | 16.0 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 14.6
    Every result from this document
  6. 14MedPIC, Risk deactivation accuracy zero-shot 38.2
    Printed as 38.2Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Hulu-Med-7B, column Deactivation; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Hulu-Med-7B | 42.0 | 48.2 | 32.2 | 16.0 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 14.6
    Every result from this document
  7. –MedPIC, Published GF-minus-CF accuracy gap zero-shot 16.0
    Printed as 16.0Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Hulu-Med-7B, column Δ_GF−CF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Hulu-Med-7B | 42.0 | 48.2 | 32.2 | 16.0 | 36.6 | 38.2 | 14.6
    Every result from this document