Gemini 2.0 Flash
Released 5 Feb 20251M contextproprietary
1 result on 1 of 13 boards, latest measured May 2026. Compare with other models
Results
Each line sits on its own board's scale. Tall tick: the board leader.
Clinical reasoning and knowledge
- 0.342Rank 10 of 10 here, 11 models on the boardLeader Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) 0.652
Index working
The Clinical Benchmarks Index is this site's own calculation: a weighted average of the board scores times a multiplier for the boards behind it. How it is computed
- MedHELM0.34234.2×0.87
- One board, so its score
- 34.2
- Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
- × 0.408
- Index
- 34.2 × 0.408 = 14.0
Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.
Sources
The quote, page and document for each of the 1 result
10MedHELM 0.342
Printed as 0.342Official leaderboard, measured May 2026MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')10 Gemini 2.0 Flash Google 0.342
Every result from this document- Also printed in MedHELM v5.0.0 release data: medhelm_scenarios group table (mean win rate): 0.3416666666666667, releases/v5.0.0/groups/medhelm_scenarios.json, table 'Accuracy', column 'Mean win rate'
Other Google models: Gemini 2.5 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Flash (7/17), Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (9/25), Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (9/25), Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Gemini 3 Flash, Gemini 3 Pro, Gemini 3 Pro (11/25), Gemma 3 12B, Gemma 3 27B, Gemma 4 12B, Gemma 4 26B A4B, Gemma 4 31B, Gemma 4 E2B, Gemma 4 E4B, MedGemma 27B Text, MedGemma 4B