Qwen3.5-27B
256K context27Bopen
7 results on 1 of 13 boards, 6 of them on secondary measures, latest measured Aug 2026. Compare with other models
Results
Each line sits on its own board's scale. Tall tick: the board leader.
Safety
- MedPICzero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match69.4Rank 6 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 80.7
Index working
The Clinical Benchmarks Index is this site's own calculation: a weighted average of the board scores times a multiplier for the boards behind it. How it is computed
- MedPIC69.469.4×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
- One board, so its score
- 69.4
- Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
- × 0.408
- Index
- 69.4 × 0.408 = 28.3
Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.
Secondary measures
Safety
- 31.5Rank 5 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 48.3
- 67.6Rank 5 of 28Leader MedGemma-27B-Text 76.1
- 78.2Rank 6 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 87.7
- 55.7Rank 6 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 69.9
- 51.5Rank 6 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 77.9
- 22.4Descriptive measure, not ranked
Sources
The quote, page and document for each of the 7 results
6MedPIC zero-shot 69.4
Printed as 69.4Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set matchEvaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Qwen3.5-27B, column Overall; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | PairQwen3.5-27B | 69.4 | 78.2 | 55.7 | 22.4 | 67.6 | 51.5 | 31.5
Every result from this document6MedPIC, Guideline-following accuracy (GF) zero-shot 78.2
Printed as 78.2Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set matchEvaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Qwen3.5-27B, column GF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | PairQwen3.5-27B | 69.4 | 78.2 | 55.7 | 22.4 | 67.6 | 51.5 | 31.5
Every result from this document6MedPIC, Counterfactual accuracy (CF) zero-shot 55.7
Printed as 55.7Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set matchEvaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Qwen3.5-27B, column CF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | PairQwen3.5-27B | 69.4 | 78.2 | 55.7 | 22.4 | 67.6 | 51.5 | 31.5
Every result from this document5MedPIC, Linked counterfactual pair accuracy zero-shot 31.5
Printed as 31.5Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set matchEvaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Qwen3.5-27B, column Pair; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | PairQwen3.5-27B | 69.4 | 78.2 | 55.7 | 22.4 | 67.6 | 51.5 | 31.5
Every result from this document5MedPIC, Risk activation accuracy zero-shot 67.6
Printed as 67.6Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set matchEvaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Qwen3.5-27B, column Activation; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | PairQwen3.5-27B | 69.4 | 78.2 | 55.7 | 22.4 | 67.6 | 51.5 | 31.5
Every result from this document6MedPIC, Risk deactivation accuracy zero-shot 51.5
Printed as 51.5Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set matchEvaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Qwen3.5-27B, column Deactivation; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | PairQwen3.5-27B | 69.4 | 78.2 | 55.7 | 22.4 | 67.6 | 51.5 | 31.5
Every result from this document–MedPIC, Published GF-minus-CF accuracy gap zero-shot 22.4
Printed as 22.4Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set matchEvaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Qwen3.5-27B, column Δ_GF−CF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | PairQwen3.5-27B | 69.4 | 78.2 | 55.7 | 22.4 | 67.6 | 51.5 | 31.5
Every result from this document
Other Alibaba models: Lingshu-32B, Lingshu-7B, Qwen3-14B, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, Qwen3-32B, Qwen3-4B, Qwen 3.5, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Qwen3.5 397B A17B, Qwen3.5-9B, Qwen 3.5 Flash, Qwen3.5-Plus, Qwen3.6-Max, Qwen3.6 Plus, Qwen 3.7 Max, Qwen3.7 Plus, Qwen 3.8 27B, Qwen3.8 Max, Qwen 3 Max Thinking, Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B, Qwen 3 VL Plus