Clinical Benchmarks
Menu

Fleming-R1-7B

32K context7Bopen

7 results on 1 of 13 boards, 6 of them on secondary measures, latest measured Aug 2026. Compare with other models

Clinical Benchmarks Index20.7Rank 114 of 1491 of 10 boardsAverage × multiplier 50.7 × 0.408 = 20.7This site’s own calculation. Working How it is computed

Results

Each line sits on its own board's scale. Tall tick: the board leader.

Safety

  1. MedPIC
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    50.7
    Rank 18 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 80.7
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026

Index working

The Clinical Benchmarks Index is this site's own calculation: a weighted average of the board scores times a multiplier for the boards behind it. How it is computed

  • MedPIC50.750.7×0.482, near its ceilingNear its ceiling: leader 80.7, weight 0.482zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
One board, so its score
50.7
Multiplier for 1 of 10 boards
× 0.408
Index
50.7 × 0.408 = 20.7

Score: the result on the board’s own 0 to 100 scale. Dot: this model; tick: the board’s leader. Weight: how much the board counts in the weighted average; bold where the board is near its ceiling and counts for less. Each result links to its quote and page; the line under it is the setting it was measured with.

Secondary measures

Safety

  1. MedPIC, Guideline-following accuracy (GF)
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    59.9
    Rank 18 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 87.7
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  2. MedPIC, Counterfactual accuracy (CF)
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    36.6
    Rank 19 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 69.9
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  3. MedPIC, Risk activation accuracy
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    53.5
    Rank 19 of 28Leader MedGemma-27B-Text 76.1
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  4. MedPIC, Linked counterfactual pair accuracy
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    12.4
    Rank 20 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 48.3
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  5. MedPIC, Risk deactivation accuracy
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    29.4
    Rank 20 of 28Leader Gemini-3.1-Pro 77.9
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026
  6. MedPIC, Published GF-minus-CF accuracy gap
    zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    23.2
    Descriptive measure, not ranked
    Independent run
    Measured Aug 2026

Sources

The quote, page and document for each of the 7 results
  1. 18MedPIC zero-shot 50.7
    Printed as 50.7Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Fleming-R1-7B, column Overall; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Fleming-R1-7B | 50.7 | 59.9 | 36.6 | 23.2 | 53.5 | 29.4 | 12.4
    Every result from this document
  2. 18MedPIC, Guideline-following accuracy (GF) zero-shot 59.9
    Printed as 59.9Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Fleming-R1-7B, column GF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Fleming-R1-7B | 50.7 | 59.9 | 36.6 | 23.2 | 53.5 | 29.4 | 12.4
    Every result from this document
  3. 19MedPIC, Counterfactual accuracy (CF) zero-shot 36.6
    Printed as 36.6Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Fleming-R1-7B, column CF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Fleming-R1-7B | 50.7 | 59.9 | 36.6 | 23.2 | 53.5 | 29.4 | 12.4
    Every result from this document
  4. 20MedPIC, Linked counterfactual pair accuracy zero-shot 12.4
    Printed as 12.4Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Fleming-R1-7B, column Pair; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Fleming-R1-7B | 50.7 | 59.9 | 36.6 | 23.2 | 53.5 | 29.4 | 12.4
    Every result from this document
  5. 19MedPIC, Risk activation accuracy zero-shot 53.5
    Printed as 53.5Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Fleming-R1-7B, column Activation; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Fleming-R1-7B | 50.7 | 59.9 | 36.6 | 23.2 | 53.5 | 29.4 | 12.4
    Every result from this document
  6. 20MedPIC, Risk deactivation accuracy zero-shot 29.4
    Printed as 29.4Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Fleming-R1-7B, column Deactivation; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Fleming-R1-7B | 50.7 | 59.9 | 36.6 | 23.2 | 53.5 | 29.4 | 12.4
    Every result from this document
  7. –MedPIC, Published GF-minus-CF accuracy gap zero-shot 23.2
    Printed as 23.2Independent run, measured Aug 2026Configuration: zero-shot; independent questions; exact option-set match
    Evaluating Counterfactual Sensitivity to Patient Information in Medication-Safety Reasoning paper, Zhitian Hou, Yuhang Liu, Pengkai Wang, Zeyu Liu, Guanghao Zhu, Zheng Liu, Shuo Cai, Congkai Xie, Zhijie Sang, Kun Zeng, Hongxia Yang (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; InfiX.ai; Sun Yat-sen University), 4 Aug 2026. arXiv:2608.03028v1, Section 4, Table 2 (#S4.T2), row Fleming-R1-7B, column Δ_GF−CF; row order: Model | Overall | GF | CF | Δ_GF−CF | Activation | Deactivation | Pair
    Fleming-R1-7B | 50.7 | 59.9 | 36.6 | 23.2 | 53.5 | 29.4 | 12.4
    Every result from this document

Other Ubiquant models: Fleming-R1-32B