Clinical Benchmarks

MedHELM

Holistic clinical evaluation across 121 tasks in a clinician-validated taxonomy, ranked by mean win rate.

Stanford CRFM10 rows10 of 11 models on the boardmeasured to May 2026

Official pagePaper
More about this boardLess

Holistic evaluation of LLMs on 121 clinical tasks across 5 categories and 22 subcategories (31 datasets) in a clinician-validated taxonomy; ranked by mean win rate.

Version 5.0.0, last updated May 14, 2026, run by the Stanford-led maintainers on a roughly quarterly cadence. No Claude 5 family or GPT-5.6 rows yet. Mean win rate is relative to the evaluated cohort, so scores shift whenever the model set changes.

Published by Stanford CRFM / HAI and multi-institution collaborators, released Feb 2025. 121 tasks / 31 datasets. Mean win rate 0-1, higher better.

  • Pairwise win rate. Nature Medicine 2026 final paper, Table 1; 37 benchmarks and nine historical models. Unit: proportion.
Headline metric
Mean win rate
Version
v5.0.0
Version released
8 May 2026
Board last updated
14 May 2026
A newer version exists
No
Paper version
Final journal paper: 37-benchmark snapshot
Models on the board
11

Ranking

  1. Printed as 0.652Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    1 Gemini 3.1 Pro (Preview) Google 0.652
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

  2. 2Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle0.642
    Printed as 0.642Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    2 Gemini-3.5-flash Google 0.642
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

  3. Printed as 0.621Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    3 Muse Spark (2026-04-08) Meta 0.621
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

  4. 4GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI0.552
    Printed as 0.552Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    4 GPT-5.4 mini OpenAI 0.552
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

  5. Printed as 0.538Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    5 GPT-5.4 (2026-03-05) OpenAI 0.538
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

  6. 6Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle0.529
    Printed as 0.529Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    6 Gemini 2.5 Pro (05-06 preview) Google 0.529
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

  7. 7DeepSeek R1DeepSeek0.485
    Printed as 0.485Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    7 DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek 0.485
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

  8. 8Claude 4.6 OpusAnthropic0.456
    Printed as 0.456Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    8 Claude 4.6 Opus Anthropic 0.456
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

  9. 9Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic0.450
    Printed as 0.45Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    9 Claude 3.7 Sonnet (20250219) Anthropic 0.45
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

  10. 10Gemini 2.0 FlashGoogle0.342
    Printed as 0.342Official leaderboard, measured May 2026
    MedHELM leaderboard (medhelm.org), v5.0.0 official leaderboard, Stanford CRFM (MedHELM), 14 May 2026. medhelm.org home, 'Current leaders Mean win rate v5.0.0' table ('10 of 11 models · Updated 14 May 2026')
    10 Gemini 2.0 Flash Google 0.342
    Every result from this document

    Link to this row

Mean win rate 0-1, higher better. Bar colour: the lab; a pale bar with an outline is a number the model’s own lab reported. Select a row for its quote, page and document.

Documents

2 documents support this board